On 01/12/2011 07:05 AM, K1TTT wrote:
> But, but, but, that would change the whole nature of the contest. that would
> cause all the old records to be obsolete. that would change strategies.
> That might force some people to turn their antennas a bit. That might
> change the perennial winners a bit. that might make it more interesting.
Perennial winners ?
Look at the top-5 in the August CW NAQP, that was just published in the
January/February NCJ. Compare that to the high-claimed scores in last weekends'
NAQP. A very different list ! This is what makes the NAQP a great contest.
73,
Steve, N2IC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|