CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestion for NAQP

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestion for NAQP
From: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Reply-to: n2ic@arrl.net
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 07:40:01 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 01/12/2011 07:05 AM, K1TTT wrote:
> But, but, but, that would change the whole nature of the contest. that would
> cause all the old records to be obsolete. that would change strategies.
> That might force some people to turn their antennas a bit.  That might
> change the perennial winners a bit.  that might make it more interesting.

Perennial winners ?

Look at the top-5 in the August CW NAQP, that was just published in the 
January/February NCJ. Compare that to the high-claimed scores in last weekends' 
NAQP. A very different list ! This is what makes the NAQP a great contest.

73,
Steve, N2IC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>