To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band? |
From: | "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de> |
Date: | Fri, 6 Nov 2009 05:27:37 +0100 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
The suppressed sideband is not the problem, even with the typical suppression of 30db. LSB on 7125.5 gets the unsuppressed sideband below the limit of your band plan and using USB on 14.150.2 gets your signal totally out of band. 73 Peter -----Original Message----- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest- I still don't think that transmitting on 7125.1 or 14.150.2 (as examples) is legal as the other sideband is not eliminated only surpressed 40 or 50DB. I _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Deleted ARRL sections, David Pruett |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Survey results #4 - Operating Time Limits, brian coyne |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band?, David Thompson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band?, Mike |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |