Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band? |
---|---|
From: | John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net> |
Date: | Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:34:56 -0500 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Well, one reason to continue to use LSB on 40 is that there are still a significant number of mostly older rigs in use that do not have selectable sidebands. The only SSB available on a given band is the one usually used. Most of us want to work everyone we can. The addition of less than 3 kHz of usable frequencies on a band is probably not a good enough reason to change the side used on that band and risk losing QSOs with hams still using those rigs. 73, John, K4BAI. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] What Happened on 10 Meters?, Sean Cavanaugh |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band?, Sean Cavanaugh |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band?, David Kopacz |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band?, Sean Cavanaugh |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |