To: | <kr2q@optimum.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band? |
From: | "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com> |
Reply-to: | David Thompson <thompson@mindspring.com> |
Date: | Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:09:11 -0500 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
KR2Q makes the recommendation that we all switch to USB on 40. I second that as the only reason why LSB is back years ago it was LSB below 9 mhz and USB above. I still don't think that transmitting on 7125.1 or 14.150.2 (as examples) is legal as the other sideband is not eliminated only surpressed 40 or 50DB. I know the ARRL OO organization look for this and getting an OO notice during any ARRL contest is deadly. Dave K4JRB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band?, David Kopacz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Deleted sections: old MDC and new MDC, Bob, W3IDT |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band?, k1mk |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band?, DF3KV |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |