To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band? |
From: | Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | n2ic@arrl.net |
Date: | Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:45:22 -0700 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Jimk8mr@aol.com wrote: > The USB on 40 meters idea does make sense. That's while it will be > adopted about the same time that the USA adopts the metric system. There is no reason why this couldn't be adopted immediately by the contesting community, is there ? Frankly, I don't care what sideband the rest of the 40 meter users use. 73, Steve, N2IC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band?, Steve London |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band?, Steve London |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band?, Jimk8mr |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band?, Jimk8mr |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |