Re: [Amps] More parasitic choke questions

["Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2010 7:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] More parasitic choke questions


> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 03:49:37 -0400, Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Suppress may be a better term that quench, but it does not absorb, it
>>prevents.
>
> REPLY:
>
> We're getting pretty heavily into semantics here. For purposes of this
> discussion, I'd say any of those words are ok.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT


Thats funny Bill as you are the one who is always nitpicking about word 
choices.

Carl
KM1H

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps