----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] More parasitic choke questions
> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:02:30 -0400, "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com> wrote:
>
>>Your understanding of parasitic suppressor design is 180 degrees opposed
>>to
>>reality. I suggest that you study up on the subject instead of inflicting
>>new amp builders and others who apparently also dont understand the
>>subject
>>(but feel the pressing need to comment) with such pathetic misinformation.
>
> REPLY:
>
> Please, give us your version. I can hardly wait to hear how parasitic
> suppressors actually do their job.
>
> I have stated my opinion, let's hear yours.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
My opinion has nothing to do with it; Im relating to facts.
It was published in QST so any ARRL member should be able to access it. It
was written by Bill Orr and a follow up by one of the ARRL staff. I want to
say early 60's. It may also be in the Orr book or an Eimac publication.
Id look it up myself but Im leaving for Canada in a few minutes.
If after you digest the articles you want to dispute it be my guest.
Carl
KM1H
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|