On 7/30/2010 7:24 AM, Carl wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill, W6WRT"<dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
> To:<amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 10:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [Amps] More parasitic choke questions
>
>
>
>> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>>
>> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:02:30 -0400, "Carl"<km1h@jeremy.mv.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Your understanding of parasitic suppressor design is 180 degrees opposed
>>> to
>>> reality. I suggest that you study up on the subject instead of inflicting
>>> new amp builders and others who apparently also dont understand the
>>> subject
>>> (but feel the pressing need to comment) with such pathetic misinformation.
>>>
>> REPLY:
>>
>> Please, give us your version. I can hardly wait to hear how parasitic
>> suppressors actually do their job.
>>
>> I have stated my opinion, let's hear yours.
>>
>> 73, Bill W6WRT
>>
>
> My opinion has nothing to do with it; Im relating to facts.
>
> It was published in QST so any ARRL member should be able to access it. It
> was written by Bill Orr and a follow up by one of the ARRL staff. I want to
> say early 60's. It may also be in the Orr book or an Eimac publication.
> Id look it up myself but Im leaving for Canada in a few minutes.
>
I quoted part of the same thing from the "Radio Handbook" 13 lines down
from this post.
73
Roger (K8RI)
> If after you digest the articles you want to dispute it be my guest.
>
> Carl
> KM1H
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|