To: | amps@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] More parasitic choke questions |
From: | "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com> |
Reply-to: | dezrat1242@yahoo.com |
Date: | Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:47:38 -0700 |
List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 03:49:37 -0400, Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com> wrote: >Suppress may be a better term that quench, but it does not absorb, it >prevents. REPLY: We're getting pretty heavily into semantics here. For purposes of this discussion, I'd say any of those words are ok. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] More parasitic choke questions, Roger |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] New HF amplifier, Hsu |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] More parasitic choke questions, Roger |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] More parasitic choke questions, Carl |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |