Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] parasitic suppressor voodoo

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] parasitic suppressor voodoo
From: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:22:56 +0200
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
On 2010-07-16 00:29, Alek Petkovic wrote:
>
> OK. Just a simple question from down under.
>
> Who, among all the subscribers on this list, knows how to do that?
>
> I'm not talking about cut and try methods. I'm
> talking about mathematics and tube spec sheets
> and parasitic frequencies etc etc. I have NEVER
> seen anything, anywhere, which gives the designer
> or builder of an amplifier, the tools or formulas to work this stuff out.
>
> Time and time again, we hear this Nichrome stuff
> raised and time and time again, the two camps
> slug it out and time and time again, nobody wins.
>
> I don't wish to align with any side here. My question is genuine.
>
> How would I design a parasitic suppressor from
> scratch? What formulas would I use to calculate
> the L, R for a particular tube or a particular rf deck layout?
>
> Don't tell me stuff like "four turns and 50 ohms
> worked for me." I am talking science and that
> sort of approach is NOT scientific. Gimme calculations. Somebody must know.
>
> 73 and thanks,
> Alek. VK6APK
>
Alek, good question. I been asking this myself many times.
I have never seen anything in any book or publication during
the 45 years I been into radio.
Always had to go for the "this worked for me" stuff.

73 Jim SM2EKM
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>