----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Chadwick" <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
To: <dezrat@copper.net>; "carl s." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>; "N7HIY"
<N7HIY@comcast.net>; <jkearman@att.net>; <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 11:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] "I gotta tell this"
> If one calls 10 times in a pile up to work the DX with 100 watts, and once
> with a kW, the product of power times time is equal. So from a ecological
> viewpoint, the two are theoretically equal, provided the overall
> efficiencies are the same. But the overall efficiency for the amp plus
> transceiver is likely to be higher, since the overhead of the low power
> stages etc is a smaller percentage.
> 73
> Peter G3RZP
Experience suggests that the MCTQ (mean calls to QSO) curve
in a big pileup isn't necessarily a linear function of power. In a
big pileup you could end up calling all day at 100 watts, in which
case the KW amplifier may be significantly more energy efficient
than the 100 watt rig. On 160 meters, you may never get a QSO
at 100 watts if the other station has a high noise floor :):)
Mike, W4EF.............................................
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|