Make sure to distinguish between grid bias supplies with truly regulated
output (with feedback) and bias supplies with low output impedance. It's a
lot simpler to make a stiff supply by resistively loading the bias supply
output it is to actively regulate it.
If one does choose to regulate the grid supply make sure it can handle some
grid current, analogous to the screen supply having to handle reverse
current. This probably means a shunt regulator
jeff, wa1hco
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 5:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] 3.5 kV 2A REGULATED Power Supply: Schematic ?
> R. Measures wrote:
> >** The grid does not and can not draw current when a competent
> >operator sets the grid potential just above the level where it can draw
> >grid-current with the max PEP drive that's available.
>
> That is only true if the grid input circuit is guaranteed to be able to
> soak up all possible levels of drive without allowing grid current...
> but that also has disadvantages: either the exciter runs flat-out and
> generates unnecessary IMD of its own, or else the exciter runs at a
> lower level and the amplifier is seriously under-driven.
>
> I truly cannot see why anyone should design (or defend) a high-impedance
> bias supply whose voltage regulation will collapse at the first trace of
> either normal or negative grid current. What's the point, when a
> better-regulated supply is just as easy?
>
>
> --
> 73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
> Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book'
> http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|