To: | GGLL <nagato@arnet.com.ar> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] 3.5 kV 2A REGULATED Power Supply: Schematic ? |
From: | Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net> |
Reply-to: | garyschafer@comcast.net |
Date: | Tue, 30 Dec 2003 22:17:24 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
I think he is just being stubborn. :>) There is nothing wrong with running the exciter and power amp at below maximum level. As Rich points out "that is the proper way to run them". The exciter should be loaded and operated at its "best operating point" and its pep limited to that amount. The amount of drive applied to the amp from that exciter should be adjusted so that the maximum pep never drives the amp into grid current. This can be done with an attenuater between the exciter and amp as an example. With a tube like a 4CX1000 it may be an advantage to have a rather high impedance bias supply rather than one that is "regulated". As that tube is rated at zero grid dissipation, it can stand only the slightest amount of grid current. By allowing the bias to increase as grid current is attempted protects the grid from drawing excess current. Normal operation should be adjusted so as to never draw grid current. 73 Gary K4FMX GGLL wrote: I've been following this nice discussion, and want to ask something about Ian's post, ¿what's bad with running exciter at a lower level and to have the amplifier "seriously under-driven"? (it seems to be not only a lower power output matter).
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Really Big Solid State Power Amplifiers, Larry Kayser |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Amps] Regulated HV and Bias Supplies, ka1xo |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] 3.5 kV 2A REGULATED Power Supply: Schematic ?, GGLL |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] 3.5 kV 2A REGULATED Power Supply: Schematic ?, Ian White, G3SEK |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |