RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

[RTTY] DE

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: [RTTY] DE
From: Jim Martin" <MM0BQI@theRSGB.net (Jim Martin)
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 08:50:38 -0000
The DE certainly distinguishes your call from the rubbish coming up on
screen.  N1MMLogger does not depend on the DE before a call is highlighted.
This I think is great in marginal conditions.

On the subject of K at the end of transmission I think the old CW ops were
100% right.  If I know a stations callsign  (or part of it) and I see a K at
the end of his transmission I will then feel free to drop in my callsign
(now with a DE at the front!).
K is an invitation to ANY station to transmit.  However if I am looking for
my QSO partner, or specific station, to reply I will send KN which means I
only want him to reply. (or BK)
Why change a convention that has worked for a long long time?
73
DE   Jim   MM0BQI

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nils Collin, SM6BSK" <nils.collin@telia.com>
To: <RTTY@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 9:49 PM
Subject: [RTTY] DE


> Gentlemen,
>
> Speaking abt "DE" I just wonder why so many of you have dropped the "DE"
in front of your call when calling or answering a CQ?   ;-)   Maybe it
sounds "tougher", but it sure makes some annoyance if you have to reach for
the mouse to catch your call!
>
> 73, Nils
> SM6BSK
>
>
> --------------
> email: nils.collin@telia.com
> --------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>