Richards,
Do both you and your significant other have PHD's or the like? That's
why you have a paradox?
John Graves
WA1JG
jh.graves@verizon.net
Richards wrote:
> Yes, true. One consideration is the fact it is a fairly in efficient
> receiving antenna as well.
>
> I guess it's just so quiet, signal-to-noise-wise that it makes a good
> receiving antenna, but that same inefficiency holds it back on
> transmitting efficiency.
>
> One of the happier paradoxes of life!Happy Trails.
>
> ==================== James / K8JHR ===================
>
>
> On 12/5/2010 6:09 PM, JOSEPH DAVIS wrote:
>> OK on Beverage Eff. Most use Beverage to receive and vertical or
>> dipole to transmit. I am still thinking why the Beverage is so
>> ineffecient for transmitt. jjdavis
>>
>>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3299 - Release Date: 12/05/10
>
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|