TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Rhombics

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Rhombics
From: John Graves <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 21:18:23 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Richards,

Do both you and your significant other have PHD's or the like? That's why you have a paradox?

John Graves
WA1JG
jh.graves@verizon.net

Richards wrote:
Yes, true. One consideration is the fact it is a fairly in efficient receiving antenna as well.

I guess it's just so quiet, signal-to-noise-wise that it makes a good receiving antenna, but that same inefficiency holds it back on transmitting efficiency.

One of the happier paradoxes of life!Happy Trails.

====================  James  /  K8JHR ===================


On 12/5/2010 6:09 PM, JOSEPH DAVIS wrote:
OK on Beverage Eff.  Most use Beverage to receive and vertical or
dipole to transmit. I am still thinking why the Beverage is so
ineffecient for transmitt.  jjdavis


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3299 - Release Date: 12/05/10



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>