TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Titan 425 3CPX800A7 Modification

To: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>, "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Titan 425 3CPX800A7 Modification
From: "Jason Cooper" <jbear45@msn.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 18:28:20 -0800
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I believe that this is the web page that has that modification.

http://www.hamradiomarket.com/articles/Titan%20P%20Hybrid.htm<http://www.hamradiomarket.com/articles/Titan%20P%20Hybrid.htm>

73,
Jason KN7AZ
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ron Castro<mailto:ronc@sonic.net> 
  To: k9yc@arrl.net<mailto:k9yc@arrl.net> ; Discussion of Ten-Tec 
Equipment<mailto:tentec@contesting.com> 
  Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 1:26 PM
  Subject: Re: [TenTec] TITAN 425 PS maintenance


  There was an article from a ham in Texas on the internet on modifying the 
  425 for 3CPX800's but I can't find it.  I recall it required an entire new 
  supply, including a custom-built Hypersil transformer from Peter W. Dahl 
  that ran more voltage and current than the original and fit in the power 
  supply cabinet.  With the higher plate voltage, less drive was required, and 
  lower grid current for legal power, but I think the real object was to run 
  much more than legal power.  The author claimed he tested the modified amp 
  at 3.2 kW PEP out..."on a dummy load of course" (yeah, right!).  I guess 
  everything's bigger in Texas!

  Like one Texan told me: "Go big or stay home"....

              Ron  N6IE
         www.N6IE.com<http://www.n6ie.com/>

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: "Jim Brown" 
<k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com<mailto:k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>>
  To: <tentec@contesting.com<mailto:tentec@contesting.com>>
  Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 1:04 PM
  Subject: Re: [TenTec] TITAN 425 PS maintenance


  >
  > One thing you would need to consider is what other high voltage
  > capacitors are in the RF deck that might need to be replaced with parts
  > rated for higher voltage.
  >
  > As I understand it, the main reason for using higher voltage with 3CPX
  > tubes is that you can achieve legal power with less plate current. I
  > don't know if there would be reduced drive requirement, or less grid
  > current. Since the primary failure mechanism in these tubes is excessive
  > grid current, that's what I would pay the most attention to.
  >
  > Also, I don't know what's in this board, but to get higher voltage, you
  > would probably have to replace the power transformer as well.
  >
  > The only condition under which I would look at this board as a
  > replacement is if most of the power supply went up in smoke. :)
  >
  > 73, Jim K9YC
  > _______________________________________________
  > TenTec mailing list
  > TenTec@contesting.com<mailto:TenTec@contesting.com>
  > 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
  > 

  _______________________________________________
  TenTec mailing list
  TenTec@contesting.com<mailto:TenTec@contesting.com>
  
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>