TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] poor harsh audio on OMNI-V

To: geraldj@storm.weather.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] poor harsh audio on OMNI-V
From: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Reply-to: ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 19:30:35 -1000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>

 Its certainly possible to have a faulty or none-standard narrow
filter.

Someone not interested in SSB operation could have put a 1.8 kHz filter in for the "wide" default 9 MHz filter. (I am guessing the Omni V filter selection scheme is very similar to the Omni VI, if I'm wrong about that point then I could be wrong about this whole message) Check out the stock number on the filter and see what you've got. If it was an Omni VI, it should be a 48058, maybe the same for an Omni V. If it is a 48037, it is too narrow for "nice" sounding SSB. If that were the case, it would be in the SSB transmit path too. What kind of TX audio reports do you get?

DE N6KB

Ten-Tec IF filter data

Model Number / Stock Code / Bandwidth Hz / Center frequency MHz / Poles

Following the number of poles are other numbers that have been reported
seen on these filters. They may be date codes or PCB design numbers.

216 / 48161 /  500 / 9.002210 / 6 RTTY filter
217 / 48036 /  500 / 9.000750 / 8
218 / 48037 / 1800 / 9.001500 / 8
219 / 48055 /  250 / 9.000750 / 6 /8047 / 6840
??? / 48057 /  ??? / ????     / 4 / 84-05
220 / 48058 / 2400 / 9.001500 / 8 /8307 / 6840
221 / 48243 /  250 / 9.000500 / 6 Low note CW filter
282 / 48054 /  250 / 6.299250 / 8
285 / 48053 /  500 / 6.299250 / 8
288 / 48075 / 1800 / 6.300000 / 8 / 9125 / N5
unk / 48127 / 6000 / 9 / ?
unk / 48074 / 2400 / 6.3 / Stock (non-option) 6.3 MHz filter>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>