TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] ot

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ot
From: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:00:35 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Thanks Lyle for your help !  John kb2huk
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lyle Dunlap" <qskqrq@grics.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ot


> John,
>
> Since you know what each letter stands for.  Move on up to whatever you 
> want
> to achieve.  Of course if you wish to stay with the "See Spot Run Fellows"
> does not really matter.
>
> If you wish to copy words and have enjoyable QSO's then you head for 
> approx
> 55 WPM.  Thats the  approximate  break point where you listen to words and
> not have to put characters together which is more taxing to your mind.
>
> Main thing RELAX your mind and if you miss a word or character dont dwell 
> on
> what it was.
>
> I can say that now but most of my life was having to copy coded groups and
> be correct.  So accuracy was paramount, speed secondary.  Not so for for
> casual conversation, at 60, 70 or above wpm you can even misspel words now
> and then and it will not even be noticed.
>
> After many years of bugs and paddles I find keyboard sending and pair of
> headphones for listening more interesting.  I took typing in high school
> many years ago so I could copy code.
>
> If you wish any more information or desire further discussion lets do it
> direct.  Lyle W9FCX qskqrq@grics.net
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>