| To: | "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] ot |
| From: | "Lyle Dunlap" <qskqrq@grics.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 9 Jan 2008 08:29:35 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
John,Since you know what each letter stands for. Move on up to whatever you want to achieve. Of course if you wish to stay with the "See Spot Run Fellows" does not really matter. If you wish to copy words and have enjoyable QSO's then you head for approx 55 WPM. Thats the approximate break point where you listen to words and not have to put characters together which is more taxing to your mind. Main thing RELAX your mind and if you miss a word or character dont dwell on what it was. I can say that now but most of my life was having to copy coded groups and be correct. So accuracy was paramount, speed secondary. Not so for for casual conversation, at 60, 70 or above wpm you can even misspel words now and then and it will not even be noticed. After many years of bugs and paddles I find keyboard sending and pair of headphones for listening more interesting. I took typing in high school many years ago so I could copy code. If you wish any more information or desire further discussion lets do it direct. Lyle W9FCX qskqrq@grics.net |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] ot, Ron Zond |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] TenTec Model 526 6n2 Meter Transceiver, W8KZW |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ot, Arne Andersson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ot, John |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |