TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Subject: Abbreviations used by amateurs.doc

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Subject: Abbreviations used by amateurs.doc
From: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 07:29:52 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I definitely agree with that Ron . The cheeseie phonetics makes it tough on English speaking hams how about forgin hams trying to keep up in a forgin language . John kb2huk ----- Original Message ----- From: "ron" <roncasa@verizon.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Subject: Abbreviations used by amateurs.doc


Gang,

One thing I gathered from all these e-mails on the subject is:

It's subjective.

We should follow a set standard list (like Q-code) and adhere to it.

This is like them phone ops making up their own phonetics of their call,
it's cool, but confusing to others especially during difficult band
conditions.

R R R (smile)

Ron, wb1hga
"the 516 is still a keeper"

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>