To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Subject: Abbreviations used by amateurs.doc |
From: | ron <roncasa@verizon.net> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:07:37 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Gang, One thing I gathered from all these e-mails on the subject is: It's subjective. We should follow a set standard list (like Q-code) and adhere to it. This is like them phone ops making up their own phonetics of their call, it's cool, but confusing to others especially during difficult band conditions. R R R (smile) Ron, wb1hga "the 516 is still a keeper" _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] TT PSU 280 diagram, Werner 'Joe' Jochem DK7VW |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Subject: Abbreviations used by amateurs.doc, Lyle Dunlap |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Subject: Abbreviations used by amateurs.doc, Carl Moreschi |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Subject: Abbreviations used by amateurs.doc, John |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |