TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] TT (Orion) Future improvements!!!

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TT (Orion) Future improvements!!!
From: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:27:53 -0800
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Try the Unofficial Ten-Tec Pages at:

http://www.qsl.net/tentec/

Click on the "Transceivers" link and they will be listed in numerical order, including the 516, which is the Argo V (latest QRP rig).

Sometimes the model number helps to clarify an issue, such as the difference between the Omni VIs; 563/564. The naming convention can get a bit confusing with the older models.

73 de Jim - AD6CW

Steve Baron - KB3MM wrote:

TT-516 ?!

ARGH!! I have no idea what a 516 is. Where do I run to look it up.

Always wondered why some TT uses insist on using model numbers.  Why does TT
waste time giving each rig a name ?


----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron Notarius" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 03:18
Subject: Fw: [TenTec] TT (Orion) Future improvements!!!





----- Original Message ----- From: "Maxwell Moon" <maxmoon@earthlink.net>
To: <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 10:00 PM
Subject: [TenTec] TT (Orion) Future improvements!!!





Ron,
I'm taking the odd step of writing you because I'm not on the


tentec-list


at present (only the TT-516 list) & because your's is the most recent post
on the topic of Orion improvements. I have some thoughts on the subject &


by


the time I get approved to post, this discussion will be nearly forgotten.
So I'm writing you on the long-shot that you might choose to pass one


ormore


of my comments to the rest of the list. And you needn't pass my name, for
that matter.


1. The idea of freeing up CPU power by dropping the scope and/or the


sub-RX is interesting. Is that something that could be done via a download
from RFSQUARED? It would be misunderstood in some quarters--others might
wonder about my sanity if I "REDUCE" my rig's capabilities--but from what
I'm reading here, I suspect many owners would give serious thought to the
option of increased performance from 'turning off' the band-scope or


sub-RX


or both. If possible.


2. When discussing a color screen & the possibility that TT mis-read


potential customers' desire I think we have to look back to the time of


the


Orion's introduction. This list, for example, despite being populated by


TT


fans & friends, did some venting over the 'deceptive' or 'misleading'


price.


Remember people angrily posting comments like, It's not a $3300 rig, it's
really at least $3600 if you count the filters, or even $4000 with the


ATU!!


That's something I remember.


My point is that in today's world, where you can easily spend more than


twice the cost of an Orion (or 3 times its cost, very soon), the Orion is
much more likely to appear if not a bargain, then very good in


bang-per-buck


terms. But there would've been much, much more indignation & outrage if TT
had introduced the Orion as a *true* $4500 or $4999 rig. (The "list price"
or MSRP had broken $4000 before the Orion but not the street price.)


3. The Orion price-feature-market niche discussion has come up a good


number of times. Would TT have been wiser to offer the Orion at $2999 but
without a bandscope? Or $4999 with color scope and packed with filters?
Interestingly, Yaesu is offering us a real-life experiment or laboratory.
With their forthcoming and somewhat modular 9000's available in 3
configurations, including no scope, lower power, etc., and color scope,


more


power, etc., we will be able to infer some answers to these otherwise


purely


speculative chats about the Orion.


PS--I'm not in ANY way endorsing the Yaesu, or for that matter any IcKY


rig, just saying that their marketing strategy offers us an object lesson.
Or, if you prefer, a sort of Monday-morning-quarterback's tool for


assessing


our friends in mgmt at TT.


Thanks for your time,
&73 / 72,
Max, k0max
Argo V owner but saving for the TT Big O!



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec





_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec




_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>