--- "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <gsm@mendelson.com> wrote:
>
> Ron, I disagree completely. The 430 was an entirely
> different rig. The
> Argosy was an old timer by that time. It was a PTO tuned,
> analog rig
> while the 430 was a digital, PLL synthesized rig, with many
> more features.
>
> The 430 had a general coverage receiver, the Argosy did
> not. The 430
> had two "VFOs" built in and could work split the Argosy
> could not.
> The 430 received and transmitted in AM and FM the Argosy
> could not.
> The 430 had 8 memories the Argosy had none.
>
> Quite simply the 430 was the future of ham radio at the
> time and the Argosy was its past.
The 430 was also the first rig I encountered that taught me a
whole lot about noisy synthesizers too. It traded
*established* performance for glitzy trinkets (the TS-820/830
ran circles around it so Kenwood did know how to build a good
radio by that time).
I used one at the Red River Radio Amateur club's (Fargo, ND)
Field Day in the summer of 1986 while I was attending school
there. I already had the 580 Delta at that time and it was a
*much* more pleasant radio to listen to than the 430. On the
430 *everything* had a mushiness to it that no amount IF
filtering or other tweaking could alleviate. If someone
bought a 430 as their first radio (as many did) they wouldn't
have even known that there were better RF performing radios
out there.
Ever since then I've looked *very* closely at the phase noise
plots of each new radio as it is evaluated by ARRL and
others. As I became more interested in VHF+ phase noise took
on an even higher importance.
I'm not against synthesizers in the least, - as long as they
are quiet, and it can be done Ten Tec has proven that in
spades with the Orion.
Duane
N9DG
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|