TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment
From: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 18:36:46 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
It didn't matter. I was comparing receivers and they were set up equally.
Same antenna. Same speaker etc. It didn't matter what caused the clicks
then. Sure we can blame it on the 930's spurious products but the fact that
those products were LOUDER on the PRO than they were on the Omni tells me
something. Question is: What did it tell me?

Steve N4LQ
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Barry N1EU" <n1eu@yahoo.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 6:30 PM
Subject: [TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment


> N4LQ reported "Both the Omni 6+ and PROII were set for
> 250hz bandwidth and equal audio output then tuned off
> frequency by 500hz."
>
> If you tuned 500hz off the fundamental xmit freq, how
> do you know you weren't hearing spurious xmit products
> rather than spurious rcvr products?  The TS-930's cw
> xmit spectrum is almost certainly a lot wider than +/-
> 500hz.
>
> 73,
> Barry N1EU
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>