To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment |
From: | John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Thu, 12 Aug 2004 17:23:25 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
My experience with a couple of DSP rigs--a 746PRO and a TS-870S--is that
the key to hearing a signal in the free and clear (or eliminating nearby
signal artifacts) involves very careful manipulation of the RF gain and/or
attenuation levels. The OMNI is much less finicky about the signal level
going forward because it doesn't have an A/D converter in the signal path
to contend with. I'm going to work an OMNI VI and the other two Friday evening/ Saturday during the WAE CW contest to see which one I like best. I don't expect to hear much difference in electrical performance, because all three are very good at getting the preferred signal to my ears, but the DSP rigs require more hands-on attention. I think it will come down to ease-of-use issues--punching buttons for various levels of selectivity for example (OMNI and PRO), as opposed to twirling a knob (TS-870S), and then fiddling with the RF gain, etc. The older I get the less interested I am in making a lot of on-the-fly adjustments. If the FT-920 had the OMNI's innards, THAT would be one mean CW rig :-) Anyhow, it's amazing the kind of selectivity available with these rigs. 73, John, W3ULS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Ten Tec accys for sale, Vern Kunes |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment, Marijan Miletic, S56A |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment, n4lq |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment, Marijan Miletic, S56A |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |