To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] Receivability |
From: | ascanand@harris.com (Scanandoah, Alan) |
Date: | Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:20:32 -0500 |
A slick thing to try would be to put a really good (e.g. Datong FL3) audio filter in place of the the stock CW filter in a Triton or older Omni. Of course, the line levels and Z would need matching. I've got some NOS National MF8s lying about somewhere, which might come close. BTW - the difference in audio that I originally noted applies only to SSB, at least for me. The Omni V sounds terrific in CW. Al -----Original Message----- From: n4lq@iglou.com [mailto:n4lq@iglou.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 3:39 PM To: Adam Farson; Ten-Tec Contesting Subject: RE: [TenTec] Receivability Old TenTec's don't use post-AGC audio filters. They use pre-AGC audio filters. It's hard to tell the difference between their af filter and an IF filter. It's sorta like these new DSP radios with their AGC developed after the IF chain or at least some resemblance. N4LQ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Receivability, Caitlyn Martin |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] Receivability, n8coo@juno.com |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Receivability, Michael Manship |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Receivability, Steve Ellington |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |