| To: | "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <N4NT@charter.net>, <TenTec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Pegasus vs. Argonaut V - CW Filter Bandwidth |
| From: | "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:40:15 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
> If Ten-Tec eliminated their fine QSK, they might as well fold their amateur > tent. I realize the QSK is a TT hallmark. What I was actually thinking was a configuration (menu) option that would let the operator choose the trade off between filter performance and QSK speed. Or, if you read the Pegasus programmers reference, you find that the radio is designed so that you can have multiple programs loaded in flash memory and select which program runs at start up. Imagine being able to run a program with brick wall 50 Hz filters for PSK when thats what you want to do, or run a different program with perfect QSK at 100 wpm when thats what you want. 73, Mark |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Pegasus vs. Argonaut V - CW Filter Bandwidth, Mark Erbaugh |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Receivability, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Pegasus vs. Argonaut V - CW Filter Bandwidth, Mike Hyder -N4NT- |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Pegasus vs. Argonaut V - CW Filter Bandwidth, Duane Grotophorst |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |