WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

[Re: [WriteLog] IC765 vs IC756]

To: <writelog@contesting.com>
Subject: [Re: [WriteLog] IC765 vs IC756]
From: ac5aa@usa.net (Duane Calvin)
Date: 12 Feb 2002 08:59:28 CST
Not at all - ICOM, Ten-Tec and others allow you to use ONE COM PORT to address
multiple rigs.  Running KW's, you have to have a com port for every rig (in
addition to your TNC's, bandswitch boxes, etc, etc.).  Plus, ICOM's and others
will operate in transceive mode over the "local network" - can't do that with
the Kenwood.  I think ICOM did it right, and apparently others do too!  (For
whatever that's worth...)

    73,  Duane   AC5AA


Bill Turner <w7ti@dslextreme.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002 20:11:18 -0800, Bob Green wrote:

>Check the address. Perhaps the '756 and the '765 use different addresses. I
>know the '756 and the '756PRO have different addresses. If they are
>different, having the right baud rate won't help at all. I manually set the
>baud rate to 19.2K on both WL and my '756PRO and it works great!

_________________________________________________________

Someone should smack ICOM's wrist over this one.  Yaesu, too.  

Kenwood radios all use the same addressing scheme.  Set up one, you
setup all.  And the '870 even has a DB-9 connector, bless their heart!!!

73, Bill W7TI
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog


Duane Calvin, AC5AA
Austin, Texas

____________________________________________________________________
Get free e-mail and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>