As a related question what is the current wisdom / custom re selecting which
sequence to run ?
I'm typically to the North and or West of most other stations and when running
FSK441 would usually run first.
The one time I made a serious effort to run FSK441 on two bands at the same
time while roving it made sense to me to run both bands on the same sequence.
I figured having both receivers running at the same time would help mitigate
any de sense issues.
Any comments would be appreciated.
73
Mark S
VE7AFZ
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 4, 2017, at 2:33 PM, Tom <k8tb@bosscher.org> wrote:
>
> One other question. From what I understand, MSK144 takes the full 300 HZ to
> 2700 Hz bandwidth. How far apart should the "slots" be? 3, 4 5 kHz? The
> reason is, if I have to listen to two station via the rocks, I can handle 3
> kHz spacing. But as this mode catches on, and it going to go the the general
> population real soon noww, how do I handle a ham neighbor 20 miles away
> running MSK144 at the same time? The 3 kHz spacing will be a problem for most
> rigs. 4 or 5 Khz would be doable on most.
>
> Tom K8TB, having fun with this Christmas present from Joe.
>
>
>
>
>> On 1/2/2017 10:29 PM, Marshall-K5QE wrote:
>> Hi Tom and everyone interested in this thread.....I think that it is clear
>> that MSK has won the war. Few, if any, will be using FSK441 in the future.
>> I would be in favor of moving the "calling frequency" back to 50.260MHz(or
>> even lower). I have the following problem: The farther we get the meteor
>> operations away from 50.125MHz, the worse the antennas work. I would be
>> perfectly happy to move the calling frequency down even farther. We have 6M
>> EME around 50.200MHz, so we need to stay away from that, but we could use
>> anything in the 50.220 to 50.240 range. I don't know of anything using
>> those frequencies. That means that at least 7 guys will come on saying that
>> their activities occur in that range....HI.
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|