VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Logging Rovers in Contests

To: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Logging Rovers in Contests
From: Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 13:45:11 -0500
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Ok, the ability to submit two logs convinced me of a purpose for logging the 
"/R". Thanks for pointing this out James. 

Chuck W5PR

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 12, 2015, at 1:41 PM, James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> Chuck - There is a subtle point with not so subtle consequences here. KK6MC/r 
> and KK6MC are not the same call and you could, in principle, have a busted 
> QSO if you log KK6MC/r as KK6MC. As a rover, KK6MC/r, I can also submit a 
> single op entry as KK6MC. So if the rover submits two logs, and you log the 
> rover  without the /r, your QSO will not be in the log without the /r and the 
> QSO can be declared non valid. I am not sure that the ARRL actually does 
> this, but it certainly can and with more stringent log checking it may happen 
> in the future. 
> 
> Log the /r on voice, CW and digital and you won’t have any problems. - Duffey 
> KK6MC/r
> 
> 
> --
> KK6MC
> James Duffey
> Cedar Crest NM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>