VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] "CQ On The Internet", Spin Doctors, and fair debate

To: VHF Contesting Reflector <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] "CQ On The Internet", Spin Doctors, and fair debate
From: Les Rayburn <les@highnoonfilm.com>
Reply-to: les@highnoonfilm.com
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:40:47 -0500
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Ever notice that some of the biggest detractors of the creation of ASSISTED classes for VHF Contesting are also among those who never show up in your log? You can do some amazing things on the Internet, including doing a search by callsign of CQ and ARRL VHF Contests over the last several years. It's interesting to see who submitted a log, and who did not.

Makes me wonder why some who seem to be so passionate about VHF contesting don't bother to actually participate all that often.

Whie I work in public relations, I don't always appreciate attempts to manipulate language to change the context of a discussion, or sway opinion unfairly. I think referring to Marshall's proposal to create ASSISTED categories in VHF Contests as "calling CQ on the Internt" amounts to dirty pool.

Announcing that you are calling CQ on a given frequency, from a given location does not constitute a contact. To do that you must actually work them on the radio. It does make it easier to find and work stations who may be within range of your stations--that is, after all, the intention of the proposal. But if the person doing so competes on equal ground with others in an ASSISTED class, who is harmed? Those who want to be purists or luddites can continue to operate without assistance and compete with others who feel the same way.

Personally, I prefer the much more liberal rules demonstrated in last week's Sprint. Contacts and skeds can be arranged in advance of the contest or during, by telephone, Internet, or smoke signals. But for the contact to count it must be made via RF.. I tried and failed to work six stations that I had skeds with arranged impromptu in a chat room. None of them went in the log.

In the end it all comes down to honor and intergrity. You either work them, or you don't. The same standard applies to debating a proposal. You can do so fairly on the merit of the ideas, or you can attempt to manipulate language. You can create a catchy turn of phrase, or you can contribute ideas, effort, time, and yes....logs into the hobby.

I judge ideas and proposals based on merits. The merit of the idea itself, and also the merit of the person putting it foward.



--
--
73,

Les Rayburn, N1LF
121 Mayfair Park
Maylene, AL 35114
EM63nf

6M VUCC #1712
AMSAT #38965
Grid Bandits #222
Southeastern VHF Society
Central States VHF Society Life Member
Six Club #2484

Active on 6 Meters thru 1296, 10GHz & Light

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>