VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Total newbie questions about 2m and 70cm antennas an

To: sjkavanagh1@yahoo.ca, vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Total newbie questions about 2m and 70cm antennas and receive filters
From: Rhinosix <rhinosix@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 17:54:19 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Lets not over look the Moxon  for 6 and 2 meters does not require a lot of 
rotor spinning.
Jerry, w2jcn fn21wr.

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Kavanagh <sjkavanagh1@yahoo.ca>
To: vhfcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Sent: Tue, May 21, 2013 8:08 am
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Total newbie questions about 2m and 70cm antennas 
and receive filters


John:

Here's a start on some of your questions.....I too started out as an HF 
contester but have been spending more time on VHF than HF for many years.

(1) A dipole on 6m will get you some QSOs.  It's what I use in my Rover setup.  
But as you can imagine, a beam is better !

(2) There is an explanation of antenna spacing on the Directive Systems website:

http://www.directivesystems.com/

Look in the "APP notes" section.  Generally speaking, smaller spacings often 
work, but you can be confident with the rules provided in that app note.

(3) An omnidirectional antenna will probably only be of help if it has 
significant gain (i.e. several stacked halos).  A Yagi usually has gain in the 
sidelobes about equal to a single halo.  The InnovAntennas beam might be 
different - they go to a lot of effort to keep the sidelobes down.

(4) One factor reducing your rotor spinning will be that most of your 70 cm 
QSOs 
will probably be done by moving people from 2m, so at least you won't need to 
turn the rotor between those QSOs.

(5) There's some very basic pointers (from an Ontario perspective) on the 
Contest Club Ontario website at

http://www.va3cco.com/VHFContestPrimer.pdf

And more on KC9BQA'a blog at

http://kc9bqa.com/?p=5931

(6) Most likely you won't really need the Inrad filters unless you have some 
very loud locals who like CW.  If they are on SSB you will probably have more 
problems with their splatter which can not be fixed by IF filtering.  The 
number 
of signals you hear at one time is normally much less than on HF and they are 
spread out more, with the possible exception of a good Sporadic E opening on 
6m.  
The stock DSP CW filtering will likely work well enough, at least to start with.

(7) Regarding the "is this enough power to have fun" question....it really 
depends on you.  The QSO rate will certainly be much less than Sweepstakes or 
CQWW (and would be even if you had a kW, most of the time !) so if rate is your 
main turn-on it may not be very much fun.  But to me, each QSO with a distant 
station on bands which most hams think are only good for local ragchews 
provides 
a bit of challenge which keeps me in the chair.

73,
Steve VE3SMA


_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

 
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>