VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover rules and criticisms

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com, Bruce Richardson <w9fz@w9fz.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover rules and criticisms
From: John Geiger <aa5jg@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>

--- On Fri, 9/18/09, Bruce Richardson <w9fz@w9fz.com> wrote:

> If you'll visit http://w9fz.com/ham/w9fzuhf09.html
> You'll see the path lengths that I worked in the UHF
> contest
> back in August.  None of the rover-to-rover Q's were
> trivial
> distance and none of them were orchestrated. 

Bruce,

You didn't move any rover you worked from one band to another?  If so, I would 
call that an orchestrated QSO of sorts at least.

73s John AA5JG


      
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>