VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover rules and criticisms

To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover rules and criticisms
From: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:35:36 -0700
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Well I think the 100Q rover to rover limit is counter productive, I would 
like to see that gone.

I had a great time pack roving in the August and September contests. In 
September we had a pack of nine ten band rovers and visited eleven grids. 
You can see some pictures here: http://www.packrovers.com

Jim, AF6O


--------------------------------------------------
From: "John Geiger" <aa5jg@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:33 PM
To: <compmtn@instawave.net>; <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; "frank 
bechdoldt" <k3uhf@hotmail.com>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] Rover rules and criticisms

> Since I have heard nothing but criticism about the current rover rules on 
> this reflector over the past 2 years or so, I am interested as to how the 
> rover rules should read?  Would any of the critics care to elaborate on 
> exactly how the rover rules should be written?
>
> 73s John AA5JG
 

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>