To: | "Zack Widup" <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>, "VHF Contesting Reflector" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting differences: VHF and HF |
From: | "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com> |
Date: | Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:54:29 -0600 |
List-post: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:08 -0500, "Zack Widup" <w9sz.zack@gmail.com> wrote: > In the 10 GHz contest this weekend everyone I worked was right there on > the 10368 frequency we'd agreed on, so I didn't have to fiddle with > tuning > the rig at the same time as I swung the dish. A pleasant experience! > > 73, Zack W9SZ A sure sign that good 10 MHz reference oscillators of all sorts (GPS disciplined, WWV disciplined, etc...) are getting cheap(er) and plentiful? :-) -- Nate Duehr, WY0X nate@natetech.com _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting Philosophy, Zack Widup |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting differences: VHF and HF, Zack Widup |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting differences: VHF and HF, Zack Widup |
Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting differences: VHF and HF, Zack Widup |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |