To: | vhfcontesting@contesting.com, chris@n9yh.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Changes to ARRL VHF Contest Rules |
From: | John Geiger <aa5jg@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Wed, 27 May 2009 06:37:47 -0700 (PDT) |
List-post: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
--- On Wed, 5/27/09, Christopher Burke <burke166@gmail.com> wrote: > Also 222, 902, and > 1.2 GHz are all equally within the range of the beginning > rover using out of > the box equipment - one might argue that 1.2 Ghz is > actually, in fact, > easiest since you can get an all-mode without using a > transverter while on > 902 and 222 you're limited to FM only without > transverters. Not if the VHF newcomber buys a used FT736R with the 6m and 222 modules installed in it. Had an identical setup myself once. 73s John AA5JG _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Changes to ARRL VHF Contest Rules, Bill Olson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Changes to ARRL VHF Contest Rules, John Geiger |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Changes to ARRL VHF Contest Rules, Christopher Burke |
Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Changes to ARRL VHF Contest Rules, Keith Morehouse |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |