To: | vhfcontesting@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Changes to ARRL VHF Contest Rules |
From: | Christopher Burke <burke166@gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | chris@n9yh.com |
Date: | Wed, 27 May 2009 00:52:51 -0500 |
List-post: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
On Tue, 26 May 2009 20:46:41 -0600, James Duffey <JamesDuffey@comcast.net> wrote: > Nate - In practice, 222 MHz is a much better choice to add to 6M, 2M > and 432 MHz to make up a four band rover than is 1296 MHz. All true, but when it comes to contest time you have to "run what ya brung." We're not talking about building a Limited Rover setup from scratch from a cornucopia of radios (or cash :-), we're talking about the dude that's got 6, 2, 432, and some band other than 222 for no other reason than that's what he's got. 73! Chris N9YH -- Chris Burke chris@n9yh.com _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Spirit of the Rules, Walter - K5EST |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Changes to ARRL VHF Contest Rules, Christopher Burke |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Changes to ARRL VHF Contest Rules, Nate Duehr |
Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Changes to ARRL VHF Contest Rules, Christopher Burke |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |