VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Changes to ARRL VHF Contest Rules

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Changes to ARRL VHF Contest Rules
From: Christopher Burke <burke166@gmail.com>
Reply-to: chris@n9yh.com
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 00:52:51 -0500
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
On Tue, 26 May 2009 20:46:41 -0600, James Duffey <JamesDuffey@comcast.net>
wrote:

> Nate - In practice, 222 MHz is a much better choice to add to 6M, 2M
> and 432 MHz to make up a four band rover than is 1296 MHz.


All true, but when it comes to contest time you have to "run what ya
brung."  We're not talking about building a Limited Rover setup from scratch
from a cornucopia of radios (or cash :-), we're talking about the dude
that's got 6, 2, 432, and some band other than 222 for no other reason than
that's what he's got.

73!  Chris N9YH

-- 
Chris Burke
chris@n9yh.com
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>