VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] 6m halo on a rover question

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: [VHFcontesting] 6m halo on a rover question
From: James Duffey <JamesDuffey@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 11:51:27 -0600
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Alex - You asked:
 >I have a halo that I could use on 6 meters, but I wonder how high it  
needs to be off the roof. I know for the turnstiles it needs to >be a  
half wave or greater in order not to heat just the clouds. Does the  
same go for a halo?
Yes, the same goes for a halo. You will notice a big difference in  
performance when it is more than a halfwave above the nearest  
conducting surface. Below about 3/8 wavelength the maximum radiation  
is straight up. The straight up component of the radiation doesn't  
significantly get reduced until you are a half wave above the nearest  
metal.
In some ways it is worse for the halo than for the turnstile, which  
are made of dipoles. The halo radiation resistance is lower than the  
turnstile, so ground losses reduce the antenna efficiency more than  
with the dipole. And the closer to ground the more the ground losses  
are. It is not so bad with a metal roof as it is with soil though.
 >What if the 6m halo is just 2 feet or so from the roof? Would that  
be a total disaster? I really would appreciate your thought on >this?
At 2 feet above the roof, which is 0.1 wavelengths on 6M, you will  
have lots of radiation straight up. Ground losses start to become  
significant at 0.1 wavelengths. Your efficiency will start to suffer.  
You will not do well on troposcatter. Sporadic E is generally a low  
loss propagation mode, and you have enough radiation at low enough  
angles to make some sporadic E contacts when the band is open with  
strong signals. You will miss the weak early openings and late  
openings though.
Anything you can do to increase that distance above 2 feet will help.  
If you can get the 2M turnstile up 40 inches, why can't you get the 6M  
halo up there? That would be a big improvement over the 2 ft, but  
still far from good. If you are worried about getting all that on one  
mast, consider getting another mast and mag mount. If you are worried  
about it staying put on the mag mount, use some temporary guys.
Having said all that, any antenna, even a poor one, is better than no  
antenna, so if you have no other choice, go for it. Just don't expect  
too much. You will work some sporadic E, but the troposcatter stuff  
will be very limited.
When I first started roving I asked around about mag mounts. I got a  
great answer from a guy in Iowa. "They work great, mine don't come off  
more than once or twice a contest weekend."
You might consider a mast just for the 6M halo. It is pretty easy to  
put one on a trailer hitch. I used EMT mast, but the 10 ft Radio Shack  
TV mast would work just as well. There are a variety of ways to mount  
it to a trailer hitch, I bolted a pipe cap with a large bolt in it to  
the bottom of the mast, put that through fender washers in the trailer  
hitch and attached a nut and a lockwasher. I braced mine with an angle  
iron on the roof rack, but you could guy pretty easily if you don't  
have a roof rack.
Just some ideas. The effort spent in getting that halo up high will  
payoff. - Duffey
--
KK6MC
James Duffey
Cedar Crest NM





_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [VHFcontesting] 6m halo on a rover question, James Duffey <=