VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] VE Rover in USA

To: Jim Forsyth <mail@jimforsyth.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] VE Rover in USA
From: Jerry Siegmund <jer.sieg@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 11:08:13 -0600
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
I was going to say also.. isn't it W3/VE3CRU/R.. ?  I believe thats the 
way it used to be.. Haven't Op'd much South of the 49th in a while..
Jerry VE6CPP
DN39or

Jim Forsyth wrote:
> If you are going to operate in the US don't you think you should read the 
> FCC regulations? Especially as regards how to identify your station.
>
> Jim, AF6O
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Bill Burgess" <ve3cru@rac.ca>
> Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 9:43 AM
> To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
> Subject: [VHFcontesting] VE Rover in USA
>
>   
>> If a VE Rover operates in the USA, I see a few ways to identify, but which 
>> is correct?
>>
>> Under HF procedure, VE3CRU/W3/Rover in FN00 and logger deletes /W3?
>>
>> Under VHF, VE3CRU/Rover in FN00 ... which is more location specific?
>>
>> Does the FCC allow for the second option?
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Bill   VE3CRU
>> _______________________________________________
>> VHFcontesting mailing list
>> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>>
>>
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
>   
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>