Duane,
Clearly you have a subject you want to discuss and you have me confused with
somebody that wants to discuss it. You responded to a post of mine which was
unrelated to your subject and you tried to shoehorn it into your agenda.
Your post below continues to try to do that by implying something that was
not present in my original post. I don't know what would motivate you to do
that and I don't need to know. Since I am not interested in your subject I
will leave you to it.
Jim, AF6O
>
>
> Didn't the comment about the "unfairness" of one op having "the phone
> number" of the rover in a rare grid imply that it was going to be used for
> presumably "scheduling" or otherwise "assist" two ops in making a Q? So
> then wasn't the lengthy list "unfairs" in response to that just an
> attempted to try and equate the "assistance" question to all of the other
> station and operator variables in VHF contesting? And my point is that
> most, except for one, of those "unfairs" listed had absolutely *no*
> relationship whatsoever to the question of the appropriateness of using
> prop loggers or spotting? ... Or not? And isn't that question the genesis
> of this thread?
>
> So, on the contrary... I think I kept up rather well.
>
> Duane
> N9DG
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|