VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting Philosophy

To: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting Philosophy
From: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <ka5cvh@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:20:28 -0600
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 23:25, Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com> wrote:

> When was the last time you saw a major radio manufacturer offer up
> rigs and marketing "sponsorship" as well as devote pages of their
> advertising to VHF+ contesting?

Mike wrote

Or with very few exceptions new upgraded high power all mode rigs that
would enable more people to get on the air easier.  I have a FT-736 w/
50/144/222/432 and would love, and find to a way to pay for a 100 watt
version of the same rig.

-- 
Mike Urich, KA5CVH
http://ka5cvh.com

If pro is opposite of con.
Then what is the opposite of progress?
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>