VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] Contesting Philosophy

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: [VHFcontesting] Contesting Philosophy
From: James Duffey <JamesDuffey@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:14:24 -0700
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Jim and others who wonder about evidence that the rules are  
dysfunctional (defering to our tech editor W5WVO :^)=)
Consider the following:
1. Several rules in VHF contesting are not rigorous, they rely on  
intent and interpretation that the sponsoring organization is  
unwilling to engage. The rule "encouraging" rovers to work as many  
stations as possible is one of these as is the suggestion that the  
rigs used be capable of communication over paths greater than a km.
2. There are some rules in place that discourage participation rather  
than encourage it. Rules limiting log submissions to one per  
individual which are absent on HF are one of these rules as is the  
limited classes.
3. The VHF/UHF contest rule making, developing, and enforcing  
functions are spread out over 5 entities, none of which feel they have  
any real authority in the process.
4. HF contesting is growing, but VHF contesting has stagnated.
5. Every ARRL VHF/UHF contest has essentially the same rules. They  
have been reduced to the set that is likely to cause significant  
complaints.
6. Although the contest exchange is a grid square and multipliers are  
grid squares, awards are still made at the section and division level.  
Awards should be made at the grid level to make things consistent.
7. Despite the proliferation of categories in VHF contesting,  
participation has not significantly increased with this proliferation.
8. Despite the proliferation of DC to Daylight rigs among the general  
population, participation in VHF contests has stagnated in the same  
period.
9. VHF/UHF rule making has not kept up with technological innovation.  
It is much easier to get on UHF and microwave bands now than it was 25  
years ago, yet the QSO point advantage for the higher bands, initially  
instituted to encourage activity there, has remained the same.
10. VHF awards are not closely tied to contest participation as they  
are on HF because the VUCC awards are not part of LOTW. And it appears  
they will not be made part of it in the future.
There are probably others. - Duffey
--
KK6MC
James Duffey
Cedar Crest NM





_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>