Another thing to consider is the casual rover. I'm not talking about the
guy who plans a route that catches the corner of 11 different grids. I'm
talking about the guy who has to work on Saturday and go to church on
Sunday. He may have a few hours each day during a contest and may only
activate 2 or 3 grids. He may even drive the same route both days. Are we
going to tell that guy that he can't operate near his house more than once?
Its unrealistic and would kill the casual rover. Its a non-starter.
Steve
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com> wrote:
> If a Rover operates from a rare grid square on Saturday and conditions are
> dismal and I can't hear him or get his attention, we miss out. If he passes
> through the same grid on Sunday and conditions have picked up, right now I
> can work him during the better conditions. Under the proposed rule, both of
> us miss out.
>
> This has actualy happened to me several times by the way; I've managed
> QSO's
> with a Rover on a later pass through a grid that weren't possible earlier.
>
> 73, Zack W9SZ
>
>
> On 2/18/09, Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > To the questions you raised...
> >
> > > From: frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com>
> >
> > > However it is not practical, fair (oh gosh I said fair, look
> > > out) nor good for stationary contestants.
> >
> > In what way is it unfair to stationary contestants?
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|