To the questions you raised...
> From: frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com>
> However it is not practical, fair (oh gosh I said fair, look
> out) nor good for stationary contestants.
In what way is it unfair to stationary contestants?
> If the point is to work as many people as possible why
> should I ignore someone if I am in a grid for a 5 minute leg
> of a road only to get there later at my desired local.
The point is *not* to work as many people as possible. It *is* to align Rover
rules with that of all other classes of entry. All other participants must
work as many people as possible from a single location within a Grid-4.
> But the better way to do this is to either engineer the rules
> to match the intent of the contest,
That is what the "three simple rules" intend to do. The problem that I am
observing is that the "genie is out of the bottle" and there is a sense of
strategy entitlement at play.
Ev, W2EV
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|