I agree with Duane's comment. We should not create an artificial "Glass
Ceiling" to the technology that is allowed in amateur radio operating events.
Yet, there remains a distinction between the single operator and the
multioperator class. The difficulty is drawing the line as to which technology
causes an operation to cross from one category to the other.
73, Fred K2TR
--- On Wed, 6/18/08, Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF contesting ethics questions
To: "'VHF Contest Reflector'" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>, aa5jg@lcisp.com
Date: Wednesday, June 18, 2008, 4:31 PM
What ham radio cannot afford to do is to arbitrarily pick some technology
plateau, or some technological place in time as the benchmark or definition of
ham radio. That is completely counter to its very purpose and I'm convinced
will surely lead to its demise in short order.
Duane
N9DG
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|