If you like the ICOMs otherwise, you may want to consider the INRAD roofing
filter upgrade. I don't have any personal experience with this modification
but the spectrum sweep on their site shows a pretty dramatic improvement. I
suspect this would improve NB performance as well.
Here is a link: http://www.inrad.net/product.php?productid=260
Anthony
NR9R
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:58 AM, <kr7o@vhfdx.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your response Russ. Since I think you were the only person (I
> think) to reply to the reflector I will reply here also. Your response
> seems to be the consensus of the several replies I received. Good info to
> know. I was pretty much expecting to run the transverter for the extra
> drive power for the amp, but if the SDR RX was superior on 6, I would have
> gone that route. My SDR-1000 should be here Friday and while I primarily
> purchased it to try some of the new weak signal DSP applications for EME,
> I
> am hoping that this IF strip will exceed the capabilities of my current
> 756PRO's. Strong signal and NB issues are a weakness in the 756PRO on 6
> meters. I used to run a TS-830 + DEMI transverter, but switched to the
> PROs for all the extra features they offered, but I had to accept those
> two
> limitations.
>
> That isn't to say that the 756PRO is trash. The noise blanker is good,
> but
> doesn't compare to a rig with an excellent blanker. The PRO does not deal
> well with multiple 20db +S9 signals especially when using dual watch.
> Unfortunately, this is common in band openings or when K6MYC is your
> neighbor. Not ready to part with my two PROs yet though.
>
> If I forgot to respond privately to any direct responses, thank you for
> your input.
>
>
>
>
> At 03:00 PM 2/23/2008 +0000, kb8u vhf wrote:
>
> >The SDR1000 has a LOT of birdies on 6m, especially near 50Mhz. It is
> also
> >not terribly sensitive so I'd reccommend using a transverter if you have
> >one available.
> >
> >-Russ KB8U
> > > Message: 3> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:47:40 -0800> From:
> > kr7o@vhfdx.com> Subject: [VHFcontesting] SDR1000 vs 6m xvtr> To:
> > vhfcontesting@contesting.com,vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu> Message-ID:>
> > <5.1.0.14.2.20080219124209.029c3d78@mail2.mydomainwebhost.com>>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed> > I am
> > curious if anyone has done any comparisons of the built-in 6m >
> > capability of the SDR1000 vs the SDR1000 as an IF for a DEMI or SSB 6m >
> > transverter. I am particularly interested in strong signal handling and
> >
> > dynamic range. Should have an SDR1000 in a couple weeks. Is it worth >
> > having the external hardware? Curious to see how it performs for EME >
> > and >60db over S9 signals. I already have a DEMI xvtr on hand.> > > >
> 73,
> > Robert KR7O/YB2ARO, DM07ba/OI52ee (ex. N7STU)> kr7o@vhfdx.com> >
> > www.vhfdx.com (KR7O/YB2ARO homepages)> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Climb to the top of the charts! Play the word scramble challenge with
> star
> >power.
> >
> http://club.live.com/star_shuffle.aspx?icid=starshuffle_wlmailtextlink_jan
> >_______________________________________________
> >VHFcontesting mailing list
> >VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
> 73, Robert KR7O/YB2ARO, DM07ba/OI52ee (ex. N7STU)
> kr7o@vhfdx.com
>
> www.vhfdx.com (KR7O/YB2ARO homepages)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|