To: | VHFcontesting@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [VHFcontesting] JT65 Mode - QSOs valid? |
From: | "Tim Coad" <timcoad@gmail.com> |
Date: | Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:07:34 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
I have read some pretty convincing articles that the validity of contacts made with the JT65 "deep search" mode are pretty iffy. Such as this article: http://www.sm2cew.com/jt65.html. But I have not read a rebuttal to the specific points he makes. His article in my mind makes me not to want to pursue this mode until I hear more details. Any one here familiar with these criticisms? Tim - NU6S _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [VHFcontesting] contest, Michael Gullo |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] JT65 Mode - QSOs valid?, John Geiger |
Previous by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] MMT1296 2M/1296 Transverter for sale!, Joe Serocki |
Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] JT65 Mode - QSOs valid?, John Geiger |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |