Any idea *who* to email?
de w1rt/john (also not a member)
On 12/21/06, George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 09:21:16AM -0500, steve kavanagh wrote:
> > I'm glad to see this. I do believe that if a
> > computerized process is used to remove QSOs from logs,
> > the results really should be justified and the rules
> > by which the corrected score is determined should be
> > transparent. Alas, not being a member (seeing as the
> > ARRL does not represent me to my gov't, etc.) it seems
> > I won't be able to see my own report.
>
> You sould be able to get a copy by emailing the ARRL
> and asking for it.
>
> >
> > In K5TR's report there are 11 dupes, 4 incorrect
> > exchanges and one "not in log" for a total of 16 QSOs
> > that should not count (or 17 including penalty QSOs),
> > but the difference between raw and net QSOs is only
> > 13.
>
> I am not sure - and I do not seem to have enough
> information with me on this computer to tell much.
>
> I will take a look at this later and report back.
>
>
> > Can someone explain these apparent discrepancies to me
>
> My pas experiance with LCR reports is that they often
> make sense when explained but that sometimes the
> text in them is less than clear. If I am making any
> sense myself.
>
>
> --
> George Fremin III - K5TR
> geoiii@kkn.net
> http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|