| To: | vhfcontesting@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] question about portable operator class |
| From: | J999w@aol.com |
| Date: | Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:23:58 EDT |
| List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
In a message dated 8/18/06 6:04:43 PM Central Daylight Time, ku4bp@triad.rr.com writes: << From reading the rules, looks like 10 watts PEP or less, portable power source and portable antennas = portable operator class. >> Unless you're out to win a plaque I'd run all the power you can. Go 100 watts or better on 6 and 2. No sense suffering. :^] John K9RZZ _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] question about portable operator class, KA6AMD |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] question about portable operator class, crawfish |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] question about portable operator class, KA6AMD |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] question about portable operator class, crawfish |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |